Theodosius of Alexandria
Theodosius of Alexandria
Header
Theodosius of Alexandria (d. 566)
亚历山大的狄奥多西 (Theodosius of Alexandria) (卒于 566 年)
Body
Patr. of Alexandria; leader of the Egyptian and Syrian anti-Chalcedonians.
亚历山大 (Alexandria) 宗主教 (Patr.);埃及和叙利亚反迦克墩派 (anti-Chalcedonians) 的领袖。
Patr. of Alexandria; leader of the Egyptian and Syrian anti-Chalcedonians. After the death of the Alexandrian patr. Timothy IV (Feb. 535), Gaianus first gained access to the patriarchal throne (who stood in the tradition of Julian of Halicarnassus ), but he was removed by the emperor Justinian after only three months and replaced with Theodosius, who stood in the Severian-Miaphysite tradition. The imperial policy had been much more lenient in Egypt than in Syria (where Miaphysite bps. were no longer to be found since the middle of the 520s). But even in Egypt, Chalcedonian pressure increased and led to the deposal of Theodosius, in 536 or 537 (there is no agreement in the sources) and his replacement with a committed Chalcedonian in the person of Paul of Tabennisi. Theodosius found refuge in the large community of Miaphysite exiles in Constantinople, protected and apparently somewhat supported by the empress Theodora . Following the death of Severus of Antioch (d. 538, after having lived as an exile in Egypt for twenty years), the Syr. Miaphysites turned to Theodosius for leadership. Only in the mid 550s did they consider electing their own patr., first Sergius and a few years later Pawlos of Beth Ukome .
亚历山大宗主教 (Patr. of Alexandria);埃及和叙利亚反卡尔西顿派 (anti-Chalcedonians) 领袖。亚历山大宗主教 (Alexandrian patr.) 提摩太四世 (Timothy IV) 去世(535 年 2 月 (Feb. 535))后,盖亚努斯 (Gaianus) 首先登上了宗主教宝座(他秉承哈利卡纳苏斯的朱利安 (Julian of Halicarnassus) 的传统),但仅三个月后他就被皇帝查士丁尼 (emperor Justinian) 废黜,并由狄奥多西 (Theodosius) 取代,后者秉承塞维鲁派一性论 (Severian-Miaphysite) 传统。帝国政策在埃及 (Egypt) 比在叙利亚 (Syria) 宽容得多(在叙利亚,自 520 年代中期以来已不再有一性论主教 (Miaphysite bps.))。但即使在埃及 (Egypt),卡尔西顿派 (Chalcedonian) 的压力也增加了,导致狄奥多西 (Theodosius) 在 536 年或 537 年被废黜(史料对此尚无定论),并由坚定的卡尔西顿派 (Chalcedonian) 人物塔本尼西的保罗 (Paul of Tabennisi) 取代。狄奥多西 (Theodosius) 在君士坦丁堡 (Constantinople) 的大型一性论派 (Miaphysite) 流亡社群中找到了庇护所,受到皇后狄奥多拉 (empress Theodora) 的保护,显然也得到了她的一定支持。安提阿的塞维鲁 (Severus of Antioch) 去世(538 年卒 (d. 538),在埃及 (Egypt) 流亡生活二十年后)后,叙利亚一性论派 (Syr. Miaphysites) 转向狄奥多西 (Theodosius) 寻求领导。直到 550 年代中期,他们才考虑选举自己的宗主教 (patr.),首先是塞尔吉乌斯 (Sergius),几年后是贝特乌科梅的保罗 (Pawlos of Beth Ukome)。
In his place of exile, Theodosius carried out, with imperial permission, the consecration of bp. Yaʿqub Burdʿoyo , and together with Yaʿqub he was instrumental in setting up a new Syr. Miaphysite episcopal hierarchy in the 550s.
在他的流放地,狄奥多西 (Theodosius) 经帝国许可主持了主教 (bp.) 雅各布·布尔达诺 (Yaʿqub Burdʿoyo) 的祝圣,并与雅各布 (Yaʿqub) 一起,在 6 世纪 50 年代促成了一个新的叙利亚 (Syr.) 一性论派 (Miaphysite) 主教等级制的建立。
Of Theodosius’s literary oeuvre, which must have been written originally in Greek, only small fragments exist in Greek, while a number of texts exist in Coptic and Arabic. It is, however, Syriac literature that has preserved by far the largest number and the most significant of his writings.
关于狄奥多西 (Theodosius) 的文学著作,其最初无疑是以希腊语写成的,现存希腊语残篇寥寥,而有一定数量的文本以科普特语和阿拉伯语存世。然而,正是叙利亚语文学保存了迄今为止数量最多且最为重要的他的著作。
The ‘Documenta ad origines Monophysitarum illustrandas’ (a collection of official and semi-official documents of the Syr. Orth. Church in the 6th cent., preserved in ms. Brit. Libr. Add. 14,602 of the late 6th or early 7th cent.) contain several of Theodosius’s letters dealing with church administration and show him at the center of the network of Miaphysite bps. and church leaders (ed. Chabot; useful overview in Van Roey and Allen, 265–303). Two letters by Theodosius (one to Severus of Antioch, and the other to Anthimus of Constantinople) are preserved in Pseudo-Zacharias (ed. E. W. Brooks, in CSCO 84, 158–63 and 168–73; FT in CSCO 88, 107–11 and 114–7) and in Michael Rabo (ed. Chabot, Syr. 290–94 and 294–5; FT in vol. 2, 211–7 and 217–9).
《阐明一性论者起源文献》(Documenta ad origines Monophysitarum illustrandas)(一部收录 6 世纪 (6th cent.) 叙利亚正教会 (Syr. Orth. Ch.) 官方及半官方文件的集子,保存于 6 世纪 (6th cent.) 末或 7 世纪 (7th cent.) 初的手稿 (ms.) Brit. Libr. Add. 14,602 中)收录了狄奥多西 (Theodosius) 的数封涉及教会行政的书信,并展现了他处于一性论者 (Miaphysite) 主教 (bps.) 和教会领袖网络的核心位置 (ed. Chabot; useful overview in Van Roey and Allen, 265–303)。狄奥多西 (Theodosius) 的两封书信(一封致安条克的塞维鲁 (Severus of Antioch),另一封致君士坦丁堡的安提姆斯 (Anthimus of Constantinople))保存于伪扎卡里亚 (Pseudo-Zacharias) 著作中 (ed. E. W. Brooks, in CSCO 84, 158–63 and 168–73; FT in CSCO 88, 107–11 and 114–7) 以及米哈伊尔·拉博 (Michael Rabo) 著作中 (ed. Chabot, Syr. 290–94 and 294–5; FT in vol. 2, 211–7 and 217–9)。
As a theologian Theodosius was forced to take a stance against the Agnoetai (a group of theologians, followers of an Alexandrian deacon, Themistius, attributing a certain form of ‘not-knowing’ to the human soul of Christ). Theodosius’s major works in this regard are the ‘Tome to Theodora’ (Van Roey and Allen, 16–56 [Syr. and LT]) and the ‘Letter to the Armenians’ (ibid., 57–59). Another theological discussion in which he became involved concerned ‘Tritheism’ (which focused on the distinctness of the three persons of the Trinity and was represented, among others, by John Philoponos ). This issue was dealt with in the ‘Theological discourse’ and some related documents (Van Roey and Allen, 103–263).
作为神学家,狄奥多西 (Theodosius) 被迫对无知派 (Agnoetai) 采取立场(这是一群神学家,追随亚历山大里亚 (Alexandrian) 执事提米斯提乌斯 (Themistius),主张基督 (Christ) 的人性灵魂具有某种形式的“无知”)。狄奥多西 (Theodosius) 在此方面的主要著作是《致狄奥多拉书》(Tome to Theodora) (Van Roey and Allen, 16–56 [Syr. and LT]) 和《致亚美尼亚人书》(Letter to the Armenians) (ibid., 57–59)。他参与的另一场神学讨论涉及“三神论”(Tritheism)(侧重于三位一体 (Trinity) 中三个位格的独特性,代表人物其中包括约翰·菲洛波诺斯 (John Philoponos))。这一问题在《神学论述》(Theological discourse) 和一些相关文献中得到了处理 (Van Roey and Allen, 103–263)。
Theodosius’s high standing in the eyes of the Syrian Miaphysites is reflected in Yuḥanon of Ephesus ’s chapter on the ‘Lives of five patriarchs’ (ed. E. W. Brooks, in PO 18.4, 684–90).
狄奥多西 (Theodosius) 在叙利亚一性论派 (Syrian Miaphysites) 眼中的崇高地位,体现于以弗所的尤哈农 (Yuḥanon of Ephesus) 关于《五位牧首传》(Lives of five patriarchs) 的章节中 (ed. E. W. Brooks, in PO 18.4, 684–90)。
References
CPG 7130–7159.
I.-B. Chabot, Documenta ad origines Monophysitarum illustrandas (CSCO 17 and 103; 1908 and 1933).
A. Van Roey and P. Allen, Monophysite texts of the sixth century (OLA 56; 1994), 265–303.
Grillmeier and Hainthaler, Jesus der Christus, vol. 2/4, 53–9.
A. Van Roey, ‘Théodose d’Alexandrie dans les manuscrits syriaques de la British Library’, in Studia P. Naster oblata, vol. 2. Orientalia antiqua, ed. J. Quaegebeur (OLA 13; 1982), 287–99.
L. Van Rompay, ‘Society and community in the Christian East’, in The Cambridge companion to the age of Justinian, ed. M. Maas (2005), 239–66. (for the wider context)
D. W. Winkler, ‘Theodosios von Alexandrien (535–566). Ökumenischer Patriarch der Miaphysiten’, Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie 121 (1999), 396–412.
, ‘Theodosius of Alexandria and some theological trends of his time (535–566)’, Harp 17 (2004), 161–76.
Citation
Lucas Van Rompay. 2011. “Theodosius of Alexandria.” In Gorgias Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Syriac Heritage. Beth Mardutho. https://gedsh.bethmardutho.org/Theodosius-of-Alexandria.