Proba

probably 6th cent.

Proba

普罗巴 (Proba)(可能为 6 世纪)
(probably 6th cent.) by Sebastian P. Brock

Proba (probably 6th cent.)

普罗巴 (Proba)(可能为 6 世纪)

Body

Syriac commentator on Aristotle’s writings on logic.

叙利亚语 (Syriac) 注释者,评注亚里士多德 (Aristotle) 的逻辑学著作。

Syriac commentator on Aristotle ’s writings on logic. The juxtaposition of Proba with Hiba and Komi in the ‘Catalogue’ of ʿAbdishoʿ has led to the view that he was associated with the School of Edessa and belonged to the first half of the 5th cent. On internal evidence, however, this is impossible, since he is clearly writing at a later date than the Neoplatonist Proclus (died 485), whom he even mentions by name (ms. Brit. Libr. Add. 14,660, f. 23rv); on the other hand, a date close to that of Giwargi bp. of the Arab tribes (thus Suermann) is likely to be too late, and a 6th-cent. date seems most likely. In two mss. (Berlin, Sachau 226, and Mingana Syr. 606) he is described as ‘priest, archdeacon and archiatros (chief doctor) of Antioch ’.

叙利亚语 (Syriac) 注释家,评注亚里士多德 (Aristotle) 的逻辑学著作。在阿卜迪肖 (ʿAbdishoʿ) 的《目录》(Catalogue) 中,普罗巴 (Proba) 与希巴 (Hiba) 和科米 (Komi) 并列,这导致了一种观点,即他与埃德萨学派 (School of Edessa) 有关联,且属于 5 世纪 (5th cent.) 上半叶。然而,根据内部证据,这是不可能的,因为他显然写作于新柏拉图主义者普罗克洛 (Proclus)(卒于 485 年)之后,他甚至指名提到了后者(ms. Brit. Libr. Add. 14,660, f. 23rv);另一方面,接近阿拉伯部落主教 (bp.) 基瓦尔吉 (Giwargi) 的年代(苏尔曼 (Suermann) 持此观点)可能太晚,而 6 世纪 (6th-cent.) 的年代似乎最有可能。在两部手稿 (mss.)(Berlin, Sachau 226, and Mingana Syr. 606)中,他被描述为“安提阿 (Antioch) 的司祭、助祭长和首席医生 (archiatros)”。

Three works by Proba are extant:

普罗巴 (Proba) 现存三部作品:

  1. A commentary on Porphyry ’s ‘Introduction’ (to Aristotle’s logical works). Of this an extract was published by Baumstark (4*–12* [Syr.], 148–56 [GT]), corresponding to f. 23r–28v in a longer (but acephalous) text in Mingana Syr. 606, f. 1–28v. There are also fragments of a 9th-cent. ms. preserved in Brit. Libr. Add. 17,215, f. 7–8 and Dayr al-Suryān Syr. Fragment 88. According to Suermann (1994) this work, unlike the others, can be dated to a time between Hiba and Sergios of Reshʿayna , but this is very problematic.
  1. 一部关于波菲利(Porphyry)《导论》(Introduction)(即亚里士多德(Aristotle)逻辑著作的导论)的注释书。其中摘录由鲍姆施塔克(Baumstark)刊布 (4*–12* [Syr.], 148–56 [GT]),对应于明加纳叙利亚文 606 号 (Mingana Syr. 606) 中一部更长(但缺首的 (acephalous))文本的 f. 23r–28v,该文本位于该手稿的 f. 1–28v。此外还有 9 世纪手稿 (9th-cent. ms.) 的残片,保存于大英图书馆附加卷 17,215 号 (Brit. Libr. Add. 17,215), f. 7–8,以及叙利亚修道院叙利亚文残片 88 号 (Dayr al-Suryān Syr. Fragment 88)。根据苏尔曼(Suermann)(1994) 的说法,与其他著作不同,这部作品可以定年在希巴(Hiba)与雷什艾纳的塞尔吉奥斯(Sergios of Reshʿayna)之间,但这很有问题。
  1. A commentary on Aristotle’s ‘On Interpretation’, ed. Hoffmann, 62–89; an earlier ms., Brit. Libr. Add. 14,660, f. 1–46 (9th/10th cent.) contains a much longer but acephalous text (f. 1r–6r corresponds to Hoffmann 79–89). According to Mingana Syr. 606, f. 140v, the Syriac translation of the ‘On Interpretation’ (ed. Hoffmann, 23–55) was by Proba, as well, but in the other mss. it is anonymous.
  1. 亚里士多德 (Aristotle)《论解释》(On Interpretation) 的一部注释,ed. Hoffmann, 62–89;一份更早的手稿 (ms.),Brit. Libr. Add. 14,660, f. 1–46 (9th/10th cent.),包含了一篇长得多但缺首的 (acephalous) 文本 (f. 1r–6r corresponds to Hoffmann 79–89)。根据 Mingana Syr. 606, f. 140v,《论解释》(On Interpretation) 的叙利亚语译本 (ed. Hoffmann, 23–55) 也是由普罗巴 (Proba) 翻译的,但在其他手稿 (mss.) 中它是匿名的。
  1. A commentary on Aristotle’s Prior Analytics, ed. van Hoonacker.
  1. 亚里士多德 (Aristotle)《前分析篇》(Prior Analytics) 注释,范·胡纳克尔 (van Hoonacker) 编 (ed.)。

Possibly also by him is a proposal ‘by Proba the philosopher’ for an improved numbering system in Syriac, still using the letters of the alphabet (Berlin, Sachau 153; excerpt in Sachau, Verzeichnis, 33–4).

可能也出自他手的是一份“由哲学家普罗巴 (Proba) 提出”的提议,旨在改进叙利亚语 (Syriac) 的记数系统,仍使用字母表的字母 (Berlin, Sachau 153; excerpt in Sachau, Verzeichnis, 33–4)。

It is just possible that this Proba is the same person as the Proba who accompanied Patr. Peter of Kallinikos to Alexandria ca. 581, who ended up as Chalcedonian metropolitan of Chalcedon.

这位普罗巴 (Proba) 有可能与那位普罗巴 (Proba) 是同一人,后者曾于约 581 年陪同宗主教 (Patr.) 卡利尼科斯的彼得 (Peter of Kallinikos) 前往亚历山大 (Alexandria),并最终成为迦克墩 (Chalcedon) 的迦克墩派 (Chalcedonian) 都主教 (metropolitan)。

References

Secondary Sources

A. Baumstark, Aristoteles bei den Syrern vom 5. bis 8. Jahrhundert (1900).

View source entry

Secondary Sources

J. G. E. Hoffmann, De hermeneuticis apud Syros aristoteleis (1869).

View source entry

Secondary Sources

H. Hugonnard-Roche, ‘La théorie de la proposition selon Proba: un témoin syriaque de la tradition grecque (VIe siècle)’, in his La logique d’Aristote du grec au syriaque (2004), 275–91.

View source entry

Secondary Sources

, ‘Probus (Proba)’, in Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, ed. R. Goulet (forthcoming).

View source entry

Secondary Sources

H. Suermann, ‘Die Übersetzungen des Probus und eine Theorie zur Geschichte der syrischen Übersetzungen griechischer Texte’, OC 74 (1990), 103–14.

View source entry

Secondary Sources

, ‘Anmerkungen zur Sprache der Übersetzungen und Kommentare von Aristoteles und Porphyrios bei Probus’, in SymSyr VI, 393–400.

View source entry

Secondary Sources

A. van Hoonacker, ‘Le traité du philosophe syrien Probus sur les Premiers Analytiques d’Aristote’, JA IX.16 (1900), 70–166.

View source entry

Cite this entry

Citation

Sebastian P. Brock. 2011. “Proba.” In Gorgias Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Syriac Heritage. Beth Mardutho. https://gedsh.bethmardutho.org/Proba.

Download BibTeX Download RIS